The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury's determinations concerning credibility. In addition to the credible testimony of the codefendant, who testified pursuant to a cooperation agreement, there was an extensive chain of corroborating evidence, which included, among other things, physical evidence recovered from defendant and incriminating statements made by him in letters to the codefendant.
The court properly adjudicated defendant a persistent violent felony offender. The predicate felony statement filed by the People, taken together with its supporting materials, including proper documents from the Division of Criminal Justice Services, sufficiently complied with the statutory requirements ( see People v. Bouyea, 64 N.Y.2d 1140), and properly established that defendant's incarceration tolled the 10-year limitation on the use of predicate felonies.
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.