AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

IN THE MATTER OF CHRISTINA C. (ANONYMOUS). SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, ET AL., appellants-respondents; AND. TRACEY C. (ANONYMOUS), ET AL., respondents-appellants; HOWARD GARDOS, ETC., nonparty-appellant. (PROCEEDINGS NOS. 1 AND 2). IN THE MATTER OF AMANDA C. (ANONYMOUS). SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, ET AL., appellants-respondents; AND. TRACEY C. (ANONYMOUS), ET AL., respondents-appellants. (PROCEEDINGS NOS. 3 AND 4). IN THE MATTER OF BRIANNA C. (ANONYMOUS). SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, ET AL., appellants-respondents; AND. TRACEY C. (ANONYMOUS), ET AL., respondents-appellants. (PROCEEDINGS NOS. 5 AND 6). IN THE MATTER OF JESSICA C. (ANONYMOUS). SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, ET AL., appellants-respondents; AND. TRACEY C. (ANONYMOUS), ET AL., respondents-appellants. (PROCEEDINGS NOS. 7 AND 8) (DOCKET NOS. N 2030/01, N 2031/01, N 2032/01, N 2033/01, N-2034/01, N 2035/01, N 2036/01, N 2037/01).

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the application is granted, and the appeal by the Suffolk County Department of Social Services is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

ORDERED that the appeal by the mother is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, for failure to perfect the appeal in accordance with the rules of this court ( see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c]; [e]); and it is further,

ORDERED that the appeal from so much of the order of fact-finding and disposition as placed the child Christina C. with the child's aunt until December 13, 2002, is dismissed as academic, as the period of placement has expired ( see Matter of Sam G., 294 A.D.2d 363; Matter of Jacqueline S., 284 A.D.2d 398); and it is further,

ORDERED that the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the father's contention, the Family Court's findings of abuse with respect to the child Christina C. and of derivative neglect with respect to the other three children were supported by a preponderance of the evidence ( see Family Ct Act § 1046[b][i]; Matter of Marc A., 301 A.D.2d 595, 597; Matter of K. Children, 253 A.D.2d 764, 765).

The record does not support the Law Guardian's contention that the parental rights of Michael C. and Tracey C. should have been terminated with respect to Christina C. We note that this result is in the best interests of Christina C., as it will allow her to continue to live with her siblings ( see Eschbach v. Eschbach, 56 N.Y.2d 167, 173).

SANTUCCI, J.P., SCHMIDT, ADAMS and CRANE, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN THE MATTER OF CHRISTINA
(Jan 26, 2004)