Citation Codes Equivalent Citations citation codes Docket Number No. 02-03-307-CV Attorney(S) Thompson, Coe, Cousins Irons, L.L.P. and Wade C. Crosnoe, J. Richard Harmon, and Shawn W. Phelan of Dallas, TX, and Cantey Hanger, L.L.P., and Ralph H. Duggins of Fort Worth, for Relators (Vesta Insurance Group, Inc. and Vesta Fire Insurance Corporation). Friedman, Suder Cooke, P.C., and Walker C. Friedman, and Walder C. Friedman and Christian D. Tucker of Fort Worth, TX, for Jimmy K. Walker. Kelly, Hart Hallman, P.C., and Marshall M. Searcy, Jr. and Brandon T. Hurley of Fort Worth, TX, for William Perry Cronin. Shannon, Gracey, Ratliff Miller, L.L.P. and R.H. Wallace, Jr., and John Christopher Nickelson, of Fort Worth, TX, for James E. Tait. Bourland, Kirkman, Seidler, Jay Michel, L.L.P., and William L. Kirkman of Fort Worth, TX, for National Benefit Advisory Assoc., American Administrative Services, Inc., Insurance Consultants of America, Inc., Robert H. Merrill, and American Business Management, Inc. Malesovas Martin, L.L.P and John L. Malesovas of Waco, TX; Ray Wilson and Donald H. Ray of Fort Worth, TX; Lively Padfield Stout and David Farris of Fort Worth, TX, for Real Party in Interest: (James H. Cashion, Jr., d/b/a American Health Underwriters) See more information ... Smart Summary Please sign up to generate summary. IN RE VESTA INSURANCE GROUP, RELATORS INC., VESTA FIRE INSURANCE CORPORATION, JIMMY K. WALKER, WILLIAM PERRY CRONIN, JAMES E. TAIT, NATIONAL BENEFIT ADVISORY ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, INC., INSURANCE CONSULTANTS OF AMERICA, INC., ROBERT H. MERRILL, AND AMERICAN BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, INC. MEMORANDUM OPINION See Tex.R.App.P. 47.4. PER CURIAM. The court has considered the "Motion To File Letter Brief" of real party in interest James H. Cashion, Jr., d/b/a American Health Underwriters, and "Relator's Motion For Leave To File Letter Brief In Response." The motions are GRANTED. Having considered relators' petitions for writ of mandamus, real party in interest's response, and all subsequent briefs, the court is of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relators' petitions for writ of mandamus are denied. Relators shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let execution issue.