AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DORIAN DIAZ, Defendant-Appellant.

Given the heinous circumstances of the crime and the strength of the People's case, counsel rendered effective assistance when he negotiated a plea involving a sentence that was less than the maximum ( see People v. Ford, 86 N.Y.2d 397, 404), and counsel was not obligated to request even further leniency at sentencing. We note that such an argument, if successful, ran the risk of undoing the plea agreement pursuant to People v. Farrar ( 52 N.Y.2d 302, 307-308).

The record does not support defendant's claim that the court's comments at sentencing exhibited bias.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. DIAZ
(Feb 10, 2004)