AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

LOMAX BARNES AND GWENDOLYN BARNES, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS v. S.T. KOCISZEWSKI AND MARY B. KOCISZEWSKI, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed with costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action to recover damages for injuries sustained by Lomax Barnes (plaintiff) as a result of an automobile accident. Supreme Court properly granted in part plaintiffs' motion pursuant to CPLR 4404(a) to set aside the jury verdict of no cause of action and granted a new trial on the issue whether plaintiff sustained economic loss in excess of basic economic loss ( see Insurance Law § 5102 [a]; § 5104 [a]). The court's error in foreclosing the jury from considering that issue unless it found that plaintiff sustained a serious injury ( see § 5102 [d]) warrants a new trial ( see Tortorello v. Landi, 136 A.D.2d 545, 546; see generally Montgomery v. Daniels, 38 N.Y.2d 41, 47-48; 1A N.Y. PJI3d 381 [2004]). Contrary to defendants' contention, plaintiffs made a sufficient showing that plaintiff sustained economic loss in excess of basic economic loss to warrant submission of the issue to the jury.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BARNES v. KOCISZEWSKI
(Feb 11, 2004)