AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

KAUFMAN SATRAN, LLP, respondent, v. SIDBERN ESTATES, INC., ET AL., appellants, ET AL., defendants.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, the cross motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellants, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.

A party seeking to vacate a default in appearing or answering must make a showing of a justifiable excuse for the default, and a meritorious defense ( see Hazen v. Bottiglieri, 286 A.D.2d 708; Miles v. Blue Label Trucking, 232 A.D.2d 382). In the instant case, the appellants made a sufficient showing of both a justifiable excuse and a meritorious defense. In addition, there was no prejudice to the plaintiff as a result of the relatively short delay.

The appellants were entitled to dismissal of the complaint insofar as asserted against them since the plaintiff's application to recover the same legal fee was still pending in a New York County action ( see CPLR 3211[a][4]).

SANTUCCI, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, SCHMIDT and COZIER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KAUFMAN SATRAN v. SIDBERN ESTATES, INC
(Feb 17, 2004)