DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the County Court's determination to designate him a level three sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence ( see Correction Law § 168-n; People v. Oquendo, 1 A.D.3d 421; People v. Thomas, 300 A.D.2d 379).
RITTER, J.P., SMITH, H. MILLER and MASTRO, JJ., concur.