Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. JOSEPH EDWARD HUDAK, Respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 18th day of February, 2004, upon consideration of the Motion to Dissolve Temporary Suspension and Enforce All Other Provisions of the Order of October 3, 2003, and the Recommendation of Disciplinary Board Member dated January 27, 2004, it is ORDERED as follows:

As the Petition for Discipline filed on November 3, 2003, does not include the allegations upon which this Court relied in entering the October 3, 2003 Order of Temporary Suspension, said Order is hereby dissolved, without prejudice to any pending or future disciplinary proceedings, and respondent is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. HUDAK
(Feb 18, 2004)