AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

LULA WILLIAMS, ETC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WHITE CASTLE SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-Respondent.

The complaint, alleging that plaintiffs ingested contaminated food at defendant's restaurant and in ensuing days contracted a blood disorder known as Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (TTP), was properly dismissed in light of the absence of any nonspeculative ground to support the inference that the allegedly offending food was in fact contaminated or that the complained-of blood disorder was causally related to food poisoning ( see Valenti v. Great Atl. Pac. Tea Co., 207 A.D.2d 340). While plaintiff Williams's treating physician hypothesized that TTP could be caused by food-borne pathogens, no scientific evidence was offered in support of this theory, much less was there evidence that plaintiffs had ingested a particular pathogen causally associated with TTP ( cf. Jaroslawicz v. Prestige Caterers, Inc., 292 A.D.2d 232).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WILLIAMS v. WHITE CASTLE SYSTEMS, INC
(Feb 17, 2004)