DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
To be relieved of their defaults, the defendants were required to establish both a reasonable excuse for each default and a meritorious defense ( see CPLR 5015[a][1]; Eretz Funding v. Shalosh Assocs., 266 A.D.2d 184, 185). The defendants failed to meet either requirement. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly denied their motion.
SANTUCCI, J.P., SMITH, LUCIANO and ADAMS, JJ., concur.