AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

WELLS FARGO BANK MINNESOTA, N.A., ETC., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MARK F. COHN, ET AL., Defendants-Appellants.

Although RPAPL § 1301(3) prohibits a mortgage lender seeking repayment of a loan from simultaneously prosecuting an action at law to recover upon a promissory note and an action in equity to foreclose the mortgage, the prohibition does not apply where, as here, the property securing the loan is located outside of New York State ( see Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. DeCresenzo, 207 A.D.2d 823; Fielding v. Drew, 94 A.D.2d 687). Accordingly, the instant action upon defendants' promissory note guaranteeing payment of the subject loan is not barred by RPAPL § 1301(3).

We have considered defendants' remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WELLS FARGO BANK MINN. v. COHN
(Feb 19, 2004)