AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. ANTHONY PANLALL, appellant.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to appeal, and that the waiver included any challenge to his sentence ( see People v. Scott, 286 A.D.2d 352; People v. Vaughn, 286 A.D.2d 354; People v. Toye, 264 A.D.2d 401). The Supreme Court asked the defendant on the record if he understood that he would give up the right "to bring th[e] case on to any higher court for any reason whatsoever" and to challenge "any motions that were made, [and] any decisions rendered" as long as the Supreme Court adhered to its sentence promise, and that "anything at all with regard to this case [would] be concluded" once he was sentenced, and the defendant responded in the affirmative.

ALTMAN, J.P., KRAUSMAN, CRANE and COZIER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. PANLALL
(Feb 23, 2004)