AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. MICHAEL ANTINUCHE, appellant.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review many of the claimed instances of prosecutorial misconduct and we decline to review them in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction ( see People v. Taylor, 296 A.D.2d 512). To the extent that the argument has been preserved for appellate review, the defendant was not deprived of a fair trial by prosecutorial misconduct ( see People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230; People v. Adamo, 309 A.D.2d 808; People v. Daly, 98 A.D.2d 803, affd 64 N.Y.2d 970).

The sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.

RITTER, J.P., SMITH, H. MILLER and MASTRO, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. ANTINUCHE
(Mar 1, 2004)