DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.
The Supreme Court properly granted the defendants' motions for summary judgment. In support of their respective motions, the defendants presented evidence establishing that the concrete wheel stop on which the injured plaintiff tripped while leaving a store carrying a box containing a computer monitor was not an inherently dangerous condition and was readily observable by the reasonable use of one's senses ( see Cupo v. Karfunkel, 1 A.D.3d 48; Gibbons v. Lido Point Lookout Fire Dist., 293 A.D.2d 646; Plessias v. Scalia Home for Funerals, 271 A.D.2d 423). In response to the motions, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact.
KRAUSMAN, J.P., SCHMIDT, COZIER and MASTRO, JJ., concur.