DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to support his conviction of murder in the first degree because the People failed to prove that he caused the victim's death is unpreserved for appellate review inasmuch as he did not specifically raise this issue on his motion to dismiss ( see CPL 470.05; People v. Gray, 86 N.Y.2d 10, 19; People v. Bedford, 296 A.D.2d 553; People v. Ruiz, 211 A.D.2d 829). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt of murder in the first degree beyond a reasonable doubt ( see Penal Law § 125.27[a][vii]). There was sufficient evidence from which a rational trier of fact could have found that the defendant, with the intent to kill, shot the victim once, causing a wound which contributed to his death, during the course of, and in furtherance of, a robbery ( see People v. Cicchetti, 44 N.Y.2d 803; People v. Bracey, 41 N.Y.2d 296, 303). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see CPL 470.15).
PRUDENTI, P.J., ALTMAN, LUCIANO and ADAMS, JJ., concur.