Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • For the appellant, Pilgrim Ritger. For the respondents, Lum, Tamblyn Colyer.
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • For the appellant, Pilgrim Ritger. For the respondents, Lum, Tamblyn Colyer.
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

O'GORMAN YOUNG, INCORPORATED, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY,APPELLANT, v. PHOENIX ASSURANCE COMPANY, LIMITED, OF LONDON, A CORPORATIONOF GREAT BRITAIN, RESPONDENT.O'GORMAN YOUNG, INCORPORATED, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY,APPELLANT,

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion by Judge Dungan in the Circuit Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, KALISCH, BLACK, McGLENNON, KAYS, JJ. 8.

For reversal — CAMPBELL, LLOYD, CASE, VAN BUSKIRK, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 6.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

O'GORMAN YOUNG v. PHOENIX ASSURANCE CO
(May 20, 1929)