AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

YOUNG AGAIN PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiff vs. JOHN ACORD, et al., Defendants

ORDER

ROGER TITUS, District Judge

Having considered Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.12(b) [Paper No. 9], Plaintiff's Opposition thereto, Defendants' Reply, and for the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion filed in conjunction with this Order, it is this 11th day of March, 2004, by the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,

ORDERED, that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b) [Paper No. 9] is, and shall be, DENIED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED, that Plaintiff's Motion for an Expedited Decision from the Court on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Improper Venue [Paper No. 17] is DENIED as MOOT; it is

FURTHER ORDERED, that Defendants' Motion to Stay Defendants' Opposition to and Consideration of Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction [Paper No. 19] is DENIED; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED, that a hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction [Paper No. 18] is scheduled for March 22, 2004, at 10:00 a.m.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

YOUNG AGAIN PRODUCTS, INC. v. ACORD (D.Md. 2004)
(Mar 11, 2004)