AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JAMES DORMAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of assault in the first degree (Penal Law § 120.10) and two counts of robbery in the first degree (§ 160.15 [1], [2]). The general unrestricted waiver by defendant of the right to appeal encompasses his present contentions concerning the severity of the sentence and the denial of his request for youthful offender status ( see People v. Hidalgo, 91 N.Y.2d 733, 737; People v. Hines, 261 A.D.2d 959; People v. Wagoner, 234 A.D.2d 831). In any event, those contentions lack merit. Defendant received the agreed-upon sentence, and County Court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's request for youthful offender status ( see People v. Williams, 307 A.D.2d 760, lv denied 100 N.Y.2d 625).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. DORMAN
(Mar 19, 2004)