The challenged portions of the People's summation generally constituted fair comment on the evidence, and reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom, in response to defense arguments, and the summation did not deprive defendant of a fair trial ( see People v. Overlee, 236 A.D.2d 133, lv denied 91 N.Y.2d 976; People v. D'Alessandro, 184 A.D.2d 114, 118-119, lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 884). The People were entitled to comment on the credibility of defendant's testimony and on the lack of evidentiary support for his claims. To the extent that the summation contained any improprieties, the court's curative actions, along with its final jury instructions, prevented any prejudice. The court clearly instructed the jury that the burden of proof remained on the People and did not shift to defendant.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.