DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. In support of their motion, the defendants established a prima facie case that they neither created nor had actual or constructive notice of the icy condition which allegedly caused the plaintiff to slip and fall ( see Voss v. DC Parking, 299 A.D.2d 346; Corsaro v. Stop Shop, 287 A.D.2d 678). In opposition to the defendants' motion, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact, and, based on the evidence presented, it would be mere speculation to conclude that the defendants had sufficient time to discover and remedy the situation ( see Penny v. Pembrook Mgt., 280 A.D.2d 590; Sellet v. United Artists Theaters, 251 A.D.2d 488, 489; Bertman v. Board of Mgrs. of Omni Ct. Condominium I, 233 A.D.2d 283).
S. MILLER, J.P., LUCIANO, ADAMS and TOWNES, JJ., concur.