AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CARLOS FRAZIER, ETC., Defendant-Appellant.

The court properly denied defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea. The record fails to support defendant's claim that the voluntariness of his plea was impaired by the medication that he was taking ( see People v. Alexander, 97 N.Y.2d 482; People v. Rodriguez, 302 A.D.2d 317, lv denied 99 N.Y.2d 657). During the plea allocution he expressly denied that such medication had any effect upon his capacity to understand what was happening. Furthermore, an examination of the minutes of the plea and subsequent court appearances supports the court's conclusion that defendant was lucid and competent at the time of his plea.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. FRAZIER
(Mar 25, 2004)