AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

JOSE RODRIGUEZ, ET AL., appellants, v. VINCENT PICCONE, ETC., ET AL., respondents.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, the motion is denied, the complaint is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Richmond County, for a new trial, with costs to abide the event.

At the commencement of the trial, the Supreme Court granted the defendants' motion to preclude the plaintiffs from introducing certain hospital records into evidence. Upon the plaintiffs' concession that they could not prove their prima facie case without those hospital records, the defendants moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to establish a prima facie case, and the Supreme Court granted the motion.

"Hospital records are admissible as business records to the extent that entries therein are germane to the diagnosis and treatment of the patient's ailments" ( Moran v. DeMarinis, 152 A.D.2d 546, 547; see Williams v. Alexander, 309 N.Y. 283; Wilson v. Bodian, 130 A.D.2d 221, 229; CPLR 4518). Contrary to the Supreme Court's determination, the statements in the subject medical records were germane to the diagnosis and treatment of the plaintiff Jose Rodriguez and therefore were admissible. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment, reinstate the complaint, and grant a new trial.

SMITH, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, ADAMS and TOWNES, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RODRIGUEZ v. PICCONE
(Mar 29, 2004)