AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ALEXANDER ROSARIO, Defendant-Appellant.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence ( see People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490). The jury was presented with conflicting expert testimony regarding the cause of death, and the record supports its decision to credit the People's expert.

Defendant received effective assistance of counsel ( see People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708, 713-714; see also Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668). Counsel's failure to request a circumstantial evidence charge could not have deprived defendant of a fair trial or affected the result ( see People v. Hobot, 84 N.Y.2d 1021, 1024).

Defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. ROSARIO
(Apr 1, 2004)