DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the trial court properly refused his request to charge the jury on unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree as a lesser-included offense of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree ( see Penal Law § 165.45). The defendant failed to establish his entitlement to the lesser-included offense charge, since it is theoretically possible to commit the crime of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree without concomitantly committing the crime of unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree ( see CPL 1.20; People v. Glover, 57 N.Y.2d 61, 63).
The defendant's remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.
RITTER, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, H. MILLER and MASTRO, JJ., concur.