Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

TREVA LANSFORD, Appellant-Cross-Respondent, v. GEORGETOWN MANOR, INC., an Oregon corporation, dba Ethan Allen, Respondent-Cross-Appellant.

ARMSTRONG, J.

Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified.

ARMSTRONG, J.

Plaintiff and defendant both petition for reconsideration of our decision in Lansford v. Georgetown Manor, Inc., 192 Or. App. 261, 84 P.3d 1105 (2004). We deny defendant's petition without further discussion. We grant plaintiff's petition and modify footnote one to read as follows:

"The summary judgment record does not establish that there is a factual issue about whether plaintiff had a substantial limitation on her ability to sleep or whether defendant perceived plaintiff as having such a limitation. We therefore reject plaintiff's assertions that she was a qualified individual with a disability or was regarded to be such an individual because of an actual or perceived limitation on her ability to sleep."

Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LANSFORD v. GEORGETOWN MANOR, INC
(Apr 14, 2004)