AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

IN THE MATTER OF NINA D. (ANONYMOUS). ST. CHRISTOPHER-OTTILIE, petitioner-respondent; and DIANE S. (ANONYMOUS), appellant, ET AL., respondent. (Docket No. B-20571/00). IN THE MATTER OF MALE S. (ANONYMOUS), a/k/a EDDIE S. (ANONYMOUS). ST. CHRISTOPHER-OTTILIE, petitioner-respondent; DIANE S. (ANONYMOUS), appellant, ET AL., respondent. (Docket No. B-20567/00).

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the orders are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We agree with the Family Court that the petitioner demonstrated by clear and convincing proof that the mother is presently, and for the foreseeable future, will be unable by reason of her mental illness to provide proper and adequate care for her children ( see Social Services Law § 384-b[c]; Matter of Joyce T., 65 N.Y.2d 39; Matter of Christina C., 185 A.D.2d 843).

After interviewing the mother and reviewing her medical records, the court-appointed psychiatrist testified that the mother suffered from major depressive disorder and borderline personality disorder. He also testified that the mother suffered from a long history of psychiatric hospitalizations, difficulty controlling her behavior, explosiveness, tantrums, and fighting that started in early childhood and continued into adulthood. He also testified that the combination of the mother's depression with her underlying personality disorder would not readily respond to conventional treatment such as medication. It was his opinion, with a reasonable degree of medical certainty, that the mother was unable, presently or in the foreseeable future, to care for her children due to her mental illness. This unrebutted testimony was clearly sufficient to support the Family Court's findings ( see Matter of Virginia Denise R., 249 A.D.2d 400; Matter of Juliana V., 249 A.D.2d 314; Matter of Denise Emily K., 154 A.D.2d 596).

In finding that the mother suffered from long-standing and continuous mental illness, the court providently exercised its discretion in declining to conduct a dispositional hearing ( see Matter of Joyce T., supra at 45; Matter of Michelle H., 228 A.D.2d 440; Matter of Angel Guardian Home v. Nereida C., 199 A.D.2d 500).

There is no merit to the mother's claim that she was denied the effective assistance of counsel based on her counsel's failure to call certain witnesses to testify ( see Matter of Kianna C., 292 A.D.2d 380; Matter of Claudina Paradise Damaris B., 227 A.D.2d 135).

RITTER, J.P., KRAUSMAN, LUCIANO and COZIER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN THE MATTER OF NINA D
(Apr 26, 2004)