AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ROBERTO AMAYA, appellant, v. DAVID L'HOMMEDIEU, ETC., ET AL., respondents.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the sole proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries was his putting his left hand under the subject lawnmower while the blades of the lawnmower were still moving ( see Liriano v. Hobart Corp., 92 N.Y.2d 232; Derdiarian v. Felix Contr. Corp., 51 N.Y.2d 308; Scardefield v. Telsmith, Inc., 267 A.D.2d 560; Breem v. Long Is. Light. Co., 256 A.D.2d 294). Thus, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit.

SANTUCCI, J.P., ALTMAN, S. MILLER and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

AMAYA v. L'HOMMEDIEU
(Apr 26, 2004)