MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the determination be and the same hereby is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed.
Memorandum: The determination that petitioner violated the conditions of his parole is supported by substantial evidence ( see Matter of Prodromidis v. McCoy, 292 A.D.2d 769). Petitioner failed to preserve for our review his contentions relating to respondent's alleged failure to produce or offer into evidence a written copy of the special condition he was charged with violating ( see Matter of Stanbridge v. Hammock, 55 N.Y.2d 661, 663). In any event, petitioner failed to exhaust his administrative remedies with respect to those contentions ( see People ex rel. McDaniel v. Travis, 288 A.D.2d 940, 941, lv denied 97 N.Y.2d 613; Matter of Boyer v. Chairman, New York State Parole Bd., 199 A.D.2d 584). We reject the further contention of petitioner that he was denied meaningful representation on his administrative appeal ( see generally People ex rel. McCrory v. Rodriguez, 191 A.D.2d 664).