AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. CRYSTAL ORTIZ, appellant.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

At an independent source hearing, the People established by clear and convincing evidence that the in-court identification of the defendant was based upon the witness's independent observation of the defendant during the commission of the crime ( see People v. Thomas, 51 N.Y.2d 466, 475; People v. Ashe, 297 A.D.2d 287; People v. Hyatt, 162 A.D.2d 713; People v. DeMaio, 154 A.D.2d 386).

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see CPL 470.15).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

SMITH, J.P., KRAUSMAN, CRANE and MASTRO, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. ORTIZ
(May 3, 2004)