AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

IN THE MATTER OF RICHARD KREISLER, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

An administrative penalty must be upheld unless it "is so disproportionate to the offense . . . as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness," thus constituting an abuse of discretion as a matter of law ( Matter of Pell v. Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 237 [internal quotation marks omitted]). Under the circumstances of this case, it cannot be concluded, as a matter of law, that the penalty of demotion shocks the judicial conscience. Petitioner's remaining contentions lack merit.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals ( 22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE OF KREISLER v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY
(May 6, 2004)