Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

PHILIP W. McCLURE, Petitioner, v. JEAN HILL, Superintendent, SRCI, DIANE REA, Chairperson Oregon Board of Parole and Post Prison Super

ORDER

MICHAEL HOGAN, Chief Judge, District

Magistrate Judge John P. Cooney filed Findings and Recommendation on April 28, 2004, in the above entitled case. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate judge's report. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982).

Petitioner has timely filed objections. I have, therefore, given de novo review of Magistrate Judge Cooney's rulings.

I find no error. Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Cooney's Findings and Recommendation filed March 28, 2004, in its entirety. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

McCLURE v. HILL
(May 11, 2004)