AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. HEIDI MESSENGER, appellant.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the County Court properly determined, after a hearing, that she violated certain conditions of her plea agreement ( see generally People v. Outley, 80 N.Y.2d 702, cert denied sub nom Maietta v. Artuz, 519 U.S. 964).

Contrary to the People's contention, the defendant did not effectively waive her right to appeal her sentence ( see People v. Boustani, 300 A.D.2d 313; People v. Dongo, 244 A.D.2d 353). However, the sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Fields, 197 A.D.2d 633; People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

ALTMAN, J.P., KRAUSMAN, GOLDSTEIN and MASTRO, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. MESSENGER
(May 10, 2004)