DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The evidence adduced at the fact-finding hearing, when viewed in a light most favorable to the presentment agency, was legally sufficient to establish that the appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of robbery in the third degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and attempted assault in the third degree ( cf. People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620; see Matter of Eric C., 281 A.D.2d 543, 544; Matter of Stephanie F., 194 A.D.2d 789).
Moreover, resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the trier of fact, which saw and heard the witnesses. Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record ( see Matter of James B., 262 A.D.2d 480, 481). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the determination was not against the weight of the evidence ( cf. CPL 470.15; see Family Ct Act § 342.2).
RITTER, J.P., SMITH, H. MILLER and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur.