AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. JAMES ROGERS, A/K/A WALTER JAMES ROGERS, appellant.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant's pro se motions pursuant to CPL 30.30. There is no evidence in the record that the People's statement of readiness on July 21, 2000, was not made in good faith or did not reflect an actual present state of readiness ( see People v. Wilson, 86 N.Y.2d 753; People v. Kendzia, 64 N.Y.2d 331, 338; People v. Santana, 233 A.D.2d 344). Therefore, there was no violation of the defendant's rights pursuant to CPL 30.30.

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.

FLORIO, J.P., KRAUSMAN, COZIER and RIVERA, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. ROGERS
(May 17, 2004)