AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ERNEST DICKENS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant-Respondent.

The affidavit of plaintiff's expert was conclusory and unsupported by any factual basis, and thus was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact with regard to the alleged defect in the stairway owned and maintained by defendant ( see Diaz v. New York Downtown Hosp., 99 N.Y.2d 542). We have considered plaintiff's other arguments and find them unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DICKENS v. NEW YORK CITY TR. AUTH
(May 18, 2004)