MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits the unauthorized use of a controlled substance after his urine twice tested positive for the presence of opiates. Contrary to petitioner's assertion, the chain of custody and the testimony from the correction officer who performed the tests confirms that petitioner's urine sample was properly secured and that all appropriate testing procedures were followed (see 7 NYCRR 1040.4 [e]; Matter of Victor v. Goord, 309 A.D.2d 1026), thereby providing a proper foundation for reliance on the positive test results (see 7 NYCRR 1020.5 [a] [1]; Matter of Carter v. Senkowski, 278 A.D.2d 730). Inasmuch as the misbehavior report, positive results of the urinalysis tests and testimony of the correction officer who conducted the tests provides substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt, it will not be disturbed (see Matter of Zippo v. Goord, 2 A.D.3d 1006; Matter of Adams v. Goord, 2 A.D.3d 927). Petitioner's remaining contentions are either unpreserved or found to be without merit.
Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Spain, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.