DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that his plea of guilty was not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily made because he was not informed that he would be subject to a mandatory period of post-release supervision is not preserved for appellate review. The defendant did not move to withdraw his plea of guilty or vacate the judgment of conviction on that ground ( see People v. Chapman, 2 A.D.3d 647, lv denied 1 N.Y.3d 596; People v. Mapp, 308 A.D.2d 462, lv denied 1 N.Y.3d 575; People v. Higgins, 304 A.D.2d 773; People v. Vatore, 303 A.D.2d 607; People v. Curry, 301 A.D.2d 658, 659; People v. Velez, 301 A.D.2d 619; People v. Wilson, 296 A.D.2d 430; cf. People v. Melio, 304 A.D.2d 247 [issue preserved by CPL 440.10 motion made in Supreme Court]). Further, we decline to review the issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.
ALTMAN, J.P., KRAUSMAN, GOLDSTEIN and MASTRO, JJ., concur.