AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MICHAEL RIVERA, Defendant-Appellant.

Defendant's present claims regarding the jury charge and the constitutionality of the depraved indifference statutes are unpreserved ( see People v. Turriago, 90 N.Y.2d 77, 83-84), and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them ( see People v. Mannix, 302 A.D.2d 297, lv denied 100 N.Y.2d 622; People v. Monserate, 256 A.D.2d 15, lv denied 93 N.Y.2d 855).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. RIVERA
(May 27, 2004)