Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT of HUMAN SERVICES v. Allen MAINARD, a Ju

MOTIONS — MOTION TO EXPEDITE — GRANTED. — Where on May 12, 2004, petitioner filed a petition for a writ of certiorari and a motion for release of the respondent juvenile, as well as a motion to expedite consideration of the matter, and on the same day, respondent's emergency petition for habeas corpus was denied below, and respondent filed an appeal of the denial of the petition for habeas corpus on May 14, 2004, the supreme court elected to hear the matter of these two extraordinary writs concurrently and accordingly granted the motion to expedite consideration.

PER CURIAM.

Respondent Allen Mainard is a juvenile currently in the custody of the Arkansas Department of Human Services, Division of Youth Services ("DYS"). Mainard was remanded to the custody of DYS after being found in criminal contempt by the Honorable Judge Linda Collier on April 29, 2004. Mainard was placed in the custody of DYS on May 5, 2004. The Arkansas Department of Human Services ("DHS") filed a motion for reconsideration of the order remanding Mainard to DYS with Judge Collier who denied the motion on May 10, 2004. An emergency petition for habeas corpus was filed that same day by Mainard.

On May 12, 2004, DHS filed a petition for a writ of certiorari and a motion for release of Mainard, as well as a motion to expedite consideration of the matter. On the same day, the emergency petition for habeas corpus was denied below. Mainard filed an appeal of the denial of the petition for habeas corpus on May 14, 2004.

[1] We elect to hear the matter of these two extraordinary writs concurrently and accordingly grant the motion to expedite consideration.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES v. MAINARD
(Jun 2, 2004)