DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the appeals are dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
The temporary order of protection expired by its own terms on August 13, 2003, and the determination of the appeal from that order would have no direct effect upon the parties. Further, under the facts of this case, the issuance of the temporary order of protection did not constitute a "permanent and significant stigma which might indirectly affect the appellant's status in potential future proceedings" ( Matter of Levande v. Levande 308 A.D.2d 450, 451, quoting Matter of McClure v. McClure, 176 A.D.2d 325, 326). Therefore, the appeal from the temporary order of protection is dismissed as academic ( see Matter of Bart v. Bart, 219 A.D.2d 710).
Furthermore, the appeal from the order of disposition which awarded temporary custody of the children to members of the mother's family also must be dismissed as academic. In an affidavit dated March 27, 2003, submitted to this court in connection with her motion for a stay, the mother acknowledged that on March 13, 2003, before the Family Court, Nassau County, she consented to the continued temporary placement of the children with her family members ( see generally Matter of Danielle C., 253 A.D.2d 431). In light of the mother's consent, her arguments on this appeal are academic.
SANTUCCI, J.P., FLORIO, SCHMIDT and RIVERA, JJ., concur.