DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was to vacate the dismissal of the action as against the appellant is denied, and the action against the remaining defendant is severed.
The action was dismissed when the plaintiff's counsel failed to appear at a final pretrial conference. To be relieved of the default in appearing at the conference, the plaintiff was required to show both a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious cause of action ( see CPLR 5015[a][1]; 22 NYCRR 202.27; Kandel v. Hoffman, 309 A.D.2d 904, 905; Precision Envelope Co. v. Marcus Co., 306 A.D.2d 263, 264; cf. Reices v. Catholic Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn Queens, 306 A.D.2d 394). The plaintiff failed to demonstrate that she had a meritorious cause of action against the appellant, as there was no evidence that the appellant was negligent in the occurrence of the subject motor vehicle accident ( see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1142[a]; Ali v. Tip Top Tows, 304 A.D.2d 683; Zelaya v. Cappadona, 294 A.D.2d 431; Gravina v. Wakschal, 255 A.D.2d 291). Accordingly, the plaintiff's motion to vacate the dismissal of the action as against the appellant should have been denied.
SANTUCCI, J.P., H. MILLER, LUCIANO, CRANE and SPOLZINO, JJ., concur.