DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.
The plaintiff allegedly slipped and fell on a water-like substance on the exterior step of a building owned by the defendant. The defendant established its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that it did not create or have actual or constructive notice of the alleged hazardous condition which caused the plaintiff to fall ( see Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History, 67 N.Y.2d 836; Gonforone v. Southland Corp., 300 A.D.2d 443; Dixon v. Lichtman, 295 A.D.2d 308; Bradish v. Tank Tech Corp., 216 A.D.2d 505; Pirillo v. Longwood Assocs., 179 A.D.2d 744). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to submit evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact ( see generally Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320).
S. MILLER, J.P., ADAMS, COZIER and RIVERA, JJ., concur.