AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. AFANADOR INDELECIO, appellant.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contentions regarding the prosecutor's summation remarks are largely unpreserved for appellate review, since the defendant made only general objections or did not object to the comments in question ( see CPL 470.05; People v. Udzinski, 146 A.D.2d 245). In any event, the prosecutor's remarks were fair comment on the evidence and fair responses to the defense counsel's statements in summation ( see People v. Russo, 201 A.D.2d 512, affd 85 N.Y.2d 872). Moreover, since the prosecutor did not state his personal belief regarding the truthfulness of the People's witness, it cannot be said that he improperly vouched for the witness's credibility ( see People v. Evans, 291 A.D.2d 569).

The defendant's remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are unpreserved for appellate review, and in any event, are without merit.

S. MILLER, J.P., ADAMS, COZIER and RIVERA, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. INDELECIO
(Jun 7, 2004)