AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STEFAN OLESNIEWICZ, appellant, v. AHMED ABU KHAN, ET AL., respondents.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that on the court's own motion, the notice of appeal from a decision of the same court dated August 19, 2002, is deemed a premature notice of appeal from the order ( see CPLR 5520[c]); and it is further,

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the cross motion is denied.

The process server's affidavits constituted prima facie evidence of proper service pursuant to CPLR 308(4) ( see Simonds v. Grobman, 277 A.D.2d 369). The defendants failed to submit a sworn denial of service. Moreover, the affidavit of Michael Levine, a nonparty, was insufficient to rebut the plaintiff's showing ( see Simonds v. Grobman, supra).

The Supreme Court erred in dismissing the action pursuant to 22 NYCRR 208.29 based upon the plaintiff's failure to submit the process server's logbook at the hearing on the issue of service of process. The foregoing rule is a New York City Civil Court rule and thus does not apply to this action, which was commenced in the Supreme Court.

ALTMAN, J.P., S. MILLER, SCHMIDT, COZIER and SKELOS, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

OLESNIEWICZ v. KHAN
(Jun 7, 2004)