AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK EX REL. JAMES ROBINSON, Appellant, v. SUPERINTENDENT OF CLINTON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY ET AL., Respondents.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Petitioner is currently serving a sentence of 15 years to life in prison upon his 1997 conviction of the crimes of grand larceny in the fourth degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree and forgery in the second degree. He filed the instant application for a writ of habeas corpus claiming, among other things, that he was illegally sentenced as a persistent felony offender. Supreme Court declined to issue the writ or an order to show cause, and denied the petition without a hearing. This appeal ensued.

It is well settled that habeas corpus relief is unavailable where the issues raised in the petition were or could have been raised either on direct appeal or in a CPL article 440 motion (see People ex rel. Burr v. Smith, A.D.3d 773 N.Y.S.2d 913, 913; People ex rel. Encarnacion v. McGinnis, 2 A.D.3d 933, 933, lv denied 1 N.Y.3d 510;People ex rel. Barnett v. Senkowski, 294 A.D.2d 686, 687). Petitioner appealed the judgment of conviction challenging his sentencing as a persistent felony offender, an argument which the Fourth Department rejected (People v. Robinson, 275 A.D.2d 965, 966, lv denied 96 N.Y.2d 738). Given that the issues raised in the petition were or could have been raised on such appeal or in a CPL article 440 motion, the application was properly denied.

Mercure, J.P., Spain, Carpinello, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. CLINTON
(Jun 10, 2004)