AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

SERGIO COBOS, JR., ETC., ET AL., appellants, v. W.A. PHIEFFER, JR., ET AL., respondents.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

"A party seeking to restore to the trial calendar an action which has been dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3404 must demonstrate a meritorious cause of action, a reasonable excuse for the delay in prosecuting the action, a lack of intent to abandon the action, and a lack of prejudice to the nonmoving party" ( McCarthy v. Bagner, 271 A.D.2d 509). The plaintiffs did not demonstrate a reasonable excuse for their failure to appear at a trial conference on June 24, 2002, and thus failed to satisfy the standard. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in denying the motion to restore.

SANTUCCI, J.P., H. MILLER, LUCIANO, CRANE and SPOLZINO, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

COBOS v. PHIEFFER
(Jun 14, 2004)