There is a serious question as to whether the court reporter correctly recorded the name of a prospective juror who was addressed by the court in a particular colloquy. Since the record is unclear, and since the identity of this panelist is material to an issue raised by defendant on appeal, the transcript requires resettlement ( see e.g. People v. Roldan, 96 A.D.2d 476; People v. Snipe, 75 A.D.2d 750).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.