DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiffs' repeated failure to comply with court-ordered discovery and their failure to timely pay monetary sanctions imposed was clearly willful, deliberate, and contumacious conduct. Thus, the Supreme Court, providently exercised its discretion in dismissing their complaint ( see Kihl v. Pfeffer, 94 N.Y.2d 118, 120-123; Russell v. BB Indus., 309 A.D.2d 914; Vanalst v. City of New York, 302 A.D.2d 515).
FLORIO, J.P., LUCIANO, TOWNES and FISHER, JJ., concur.