Plaintiff argues that the trial court erred in charging the jury that it could draw adverse inferences against plaintiff based on his failure to call two of his treating physicians and to introduce MRIs performed shortly after the accident. However, because the missing physicians and MRIs pertained only to damages, and because the jury, which found defendants negligent but that such negligence was not a substantial factor in causing plaintiff's injuries, never reached the issue of damages, the error, if any, was harmless and may not serve as a ground for a new trial ( Gilbert v. Luvin, 286 A.D.2d 600).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.