AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. JOHN MARQUEZ, appellant.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The evidence before the grand jury established that when the defendant slashed the victim across the chest with a box cutter, the victim was not armed, and the defendant had no reason to believe that the victim was carrying a weapon or was about to use deadly physical force against him ( see People v. Reynoso, 73 N.Y.2d 816; People v. Hosein, 221 A.D.2d 563; People v. Porter, 161 A.D.2d 811; People v. Harris, 134 A.D.2d 369; People v. Figueroa, 111 A.D.2d 765). Therefore, the prosecutor was not obligated to give the grand jury a justification charge.

The defendant's remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit ( see People v. Hayes, 97 N.Y.2d 203, 208; People v. Goetz, 68 N.Y.2d 96; People v. Foy, 32 N.Y.2d 473, 478; People v. Jones, 294 A.D.2d 517).

H. MILLER, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, COZIER and MASTRO, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. MARQUEZ
(Jun 21, 2004)